Answer: Far does not direct the subcontracting decisions of prime contractors. Furthermore, the SBA Regulation does not provide that a prime contractor must subcontract before being able to subcontract, whether or not the contract is awarded to an undertaking in a similar situation. This final rule will not be revised to include the requested language, as the rule complies with the rules of the SBA. Comment: One respondent stated that the proposed tender provision does not indicate that the SBA may derogate from the requirements of the non-manufacturer rule, either on an individual basis or by category; and in addition, the provision does not specify that non-manufacturers do not need to have more than 500 employees. The respondent further stated that the SBA had proposed to delete its rule on “kit assemblers” and suggested that the Commission similarly remove all rules on “kit assemblers”. The purpose of this rule is to implement Section 1651 of the NDAA for the 2013 fiscal year. Section 1651 contains revised restrictions on subcontracting that apply to all small business programs. In addition, restrictions on subcontracting must be determined on the basis of the percentage of the total amount of compensation that a prime contractor spends on its subcontractors. In addition, Article 1651 provides that the percentage of the amount of the award that the main contractor spends on subcontractors who are in a similar situation is not to be regarded as a subcontractor within the meaning of the restrictions on subcontracting provided for in Article 1651. On December 4, 2018, the DoD, GSA, and NASA released a proposed rule under 83 FR 62540 to implement regulatory changes made by the Small Business Administration (SBA) in its Final Rule, which was published on the Federal Register on May 31, 2016 at 81 FR 34243 and went into effect on June 30, 2016. The SBA Final Rule implements the legal requirements of Section 1651 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal year 2013 (15 U.S.C.
657s). Section 1651 revised and standardized restrictions on subcontracting, including the non-manufacturer rule for small businesses under Part 19 of the FAR. Twenty-nine respondents commented on the proposed rule. Often, Primes will use its subcontractors during the pre-award process. Subcontractors should be aware that if the Prime Minister proposes to the government that the Prime Minister has entered into certain subcontracting agreements and the Prime Minister`s proposal is evaluated on that basis, the lead government may not allow the Prime Minister to amend its subcontracting agreements after the contract has been awarded. c) The designation of certain subcontractors during contract negotiations alone does not meet the requirements for prior notification or consent under clause 52.244-2. However, where the contracting authority considers that the notice or authorisation requirements for certain subcontracts evaluated during the negotiations have been met, the Commissioner shall indicate those subcontracts in point (j) of clause 52.244-2. Prime contractors implementing federal government projects must ensure that they meet the correct preferential debit requirements. Failure to include the relevant FAR clauses in federal government contracts may result in termination due to government default. In addition, a company can spend tens of thousands of dollars on litigation that could have been resolved by including the respective FAR transfer clauses to subcontractors.
Comment: Two respondents noted that restrictions on subcontracting, including those related to the non-manufacturer rule, should not apply to acquisitions of commercial and commercially available standard items (COTS), as the complex and confusing limits conflict with the simple nature of commercial acquisitions and COTS. Here is a list of some commonly used mandatory flow clauses. Mandatory does not mean “always include in all subcontracts”. Principals and subcontractors should be aware that their specific government contract may include a list of mandatory clauses that is very different from the list below. (3) In general construction, it shall not pay more than 85 per cent of the amount paid by the Government for the performance of the contract without the cost of materials to subcontractors who are not companies in a similar situation. Any work that an enterprise in a similar situation subcontracts is taken into account in the subcontracting amount of 85 % of the main contractor, which cannot be exceeded; or The government terminated the main contract and, as a result, the subcontractor suffered damages as a result of the termination. Nevertheless, the subcontractor had great difficulty in proving that it had a valid contract with the federal government. The usual rule is that subcontractors can only claim if the subcontractor first submits the claim to the Prime, and then, as a next step, the Prime “sponsors” the claim by submitting it to the government as if it were the Claim of the Prime. Not all clauses in government contracts are mandatory downlink clauses (Federal Acquisition Regulation) for subcontractors.
Prime contractors who apply for government contracts often offer the opportunity to outsource to other companies. However, there is some confusion as to whether specific FAR contractual expiry clauses apply to subcontractors. The reality is that different types of contracts awarded have different main flows up to provisions for subcontractors. Government contracts often contain clauses that apply only to federal contracts and can impact a prime contractor`s ability to meet its obligations to subcontractors. It may be advantageous for a Prime to be transferred to subcontractors and perhaps even to lower-level subcontractors, as these clauses are either unchanged or adapted so that the clauses related to subcontracting make sense. Enforcement of acquisitions made during or below the SAT will maximize the positive impact that set-aside and exclusive supply contracts provide to small businesses under socio-economic programs (p. e.B., HUBZone, 8(a), Veterans with Service Disabilities and Women-Owned Small Business Programs) by ensuring that these benefits extend to the many contracts assessed under the SAT. .